Recent Comments

Assumptions and the Age of the Earth. New Digger Doug Episodes 19 and Houts who holds a Ph. Scientific advances continue to confirm the Bible in all areas where science can be applied. Research related to the human genome has uncovered the incredible complexity of DNA, and the idea that random mutations followed by natural selection could somehow turn a single cell into all of the different forms of life we see around us is being further discredited each day Sanford, Because true science continues to discredit the Theory of Evolution, atheists have been forced to focus discussion on topics where conclusions are drawn primarily based on the assumptions that are made, and not on actual science. If an unsuspecting individual can be convinced to accept atheistic assumptions, they can then often be convinced that atheism may be true or, at least, that portions of the Bible may be false.

Answers in Genesis’ Deceptive Video on Radiometric Dating

On Saturday, April 18, , eager fossil hunters will gather at beautiful Caesar Creek Lake in Warren County, Ohio, for a day of learning, fun, and hands-on adventure. And you can join them for our next Fossil Hunt! Learn more about this exciting opportunity below. Spend the day exploring the rich fossil beds around Caesar Creek Lake and collecting fossils you can take home with you.

You never know what you might find. Previous groups have uncovered corals, clams, various other marine invertebrates, and even trilobites!

Join Dr. Andrew Snelling as he takes a close examination of radiocarbon, tree rings, and varves.

See this page in: Hungarian , Russian , Spanish. P eople who ask about carbon 14 C dating usually want to know about the radiometric [1] dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years—carbon dating can only give thousands of years. People wonder how millions of years could be squeezed into the biblical account of history. Clearly, such huge time periods cannot be fitted into the Bible without compromising what the Bible says about the goodness of God and the origin of sin, death and suffering —the reason Jesus came into the world See Six Days?

Christians , by definition, take the statements of Jesus Christ seriously. He said,. This only makes sense with a time-line beginning with the creation week thousands of years ago. It makes no sense at all if man appeared at the end of billions of years.

Circular Reasoning in Dating Methods

By Kirk Reynolds. The global flood as described in the Bible has been attacked by Christians as well as non-Christians. Those Christians who do not hold to a literal reading of Genesis are willing to believe in the old age of the earth as proposed by evolution.

Earth Is Old? | Answers in Genesis. Many accept radiometric dating methods as proof that the earth is millions of years old, in contrast to the biblical timeline.

Flaws in Dating? Roland Watts. Matt’s style is to post a link from a creationist web site, usually Answers in Genesis, which contains the usual bunkum that has been refuted many times then to refuse to acknowledge any rebuttals. Below is a critical look at one of Matt’s typical posts. In this one Matt airs the old creationist claim that the dating system is flawed. On March 10 you posted a link under the heading “Flaws in Dating“. The link ended at an AiG site with an article, Flaws in dating the earth as ancient by Mr.

Alexander Williams, B.

Creation Science Rebuttals

Evolutionary dating methods are often unreliable and inconsistent. Blind experiments have revealed that if the age of a fossil is known, then radiometric dating does not work. However, some scientists still assume that if the age of a fossil is not known, then the radiometric date is accurate. Not all dating methods give dates of millions of years; however, evolutionists will often use several dating methods and pick the one that gives them the date they are expecting.

Radiometric dating methods are based on uniformitarianism.

Matt’s style is to post a link from a creationist web site, usually Answers in Genesis, Concordia (U/U) and uranium/thorium Concordia (U/Th) dating methods.

We are a c 3 non-profit company tax-exempt status approved , so your contributions to our ministry are welcome! Equipping youth pastors, parents, and students with Biblical answers for evolutionary teaching in public schools. Carbon dating assigns ages to once-living materials such as wood, bone, teeth, and shells. Evolutionary researchers do not use it to age-date rocks. It begins by measuring the ratio of radioactive versus stable versions of an element.

Carbon dating works by basing an age calculation on the ratio of radioactive carbon 14 C to normal carbon 12 C in the atmosphere before nuclear bomb testing to the same ratio in the sample. Carbon decays to nitrogen. Given the relatively short 14 C half-life of 5, years, organic materials purportedly older than , years nearly 18 half-lives should contain absolutely no detectable 14 C.

Dating Methods

Before we begin, it should be explained that AIG believes the Earth to be around 6, years old- a number they arrived at by tracing the Biblical history. Very eager to attack the validity of radioactive dating methods, AIG questions radiocarbon dating. However, AIG claims that scientists have found diamonds projected to be over 50, years old with C Therefore, AIG proposes this is proof that C dating techniques are wrong and the earth cannot be that old.

for Creation Research, the Creation Research Society, and Answers in Genesis, yield inconsistent dates as examples of how traditional radioisotope dating is be commended for trying to use scientific methods for proving a young Earth.

The Creation Apologetics Master Class is a set of 6 online courses that will help you acquire a solid understanding of creation apologetics, equipping you to stand strong in your faith, think biblically, and more effectively share the gospel with others. The visitor overlooks at Bryce Canyon, Utah, provide a breathtaking spectacle of row upon row of towering columns painted pink, red, white, and orange.

Together, these columns were formed in a series of horseshoe-shaped amphitheaters, cut into the surrounding cliffs. The Smoky Mountains offer much more than breathtaking vistas and vacation getaways. Is this dating method reliable? Riding the rapids between the mile-high walls of the Grand Canyon, a rafter supposedly peers up at millions of years of earth history.

How do scientists arrive at such an old age? And is the worldwide geologic column really a clincher for the long ages required for evolution? As I stood staring at the incredible geologic features that resulted from the eruption of Mount St. Helens in Washington State, I was reminded afresh of how small and vulnerable we are as humans. If there really was a global flood as described in Genesis, what would we expect to see today?

Billions of dead things buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth. And that is exactly what we do see. But where are all the fossils of pre-flood humans?

Hunt for Fossils with a Geologist and Paleontologist

Here I want to concentrate on another source of error, namely, processes that take place within magma chambers. To me it has been a real eye opener to see all the processes that are taking place and their potential influence on radiometric dating. Radiometric dating is largely done on rock that has formed from solidified lava. Lava properly called magma before it erupts fills large underground chambers called magma chambers.

Dr. Willard Libby, the founder of the 14C dating method, assumed the ratio of 14C ; Ken Ham, Andrew Snelling, and Carl Weiland, The Answers Book, (El.

Doesn’t Carbon Dating Disprove the bible? The atomic number corresponds to the number of protons in an. Atomic mass is a comb in ation of the number of protons and. The electrons are so much lighter that. S in ce the Bible is the in spired Word. Are the re any assumptions in volved in the.

Doesn’t Carbon-14 Dating Disprove the bible? – Answers in Genesis

Radiocarbon dating can easily establish that humans have been on the earth for over twenty thousand years, at least twice as long as creationists are willing to allow. Therefore it should come as no surprise that creationists at the Institute for Creation Research ICR have been trying desperately to discredit this method for years. They have their work cut out for them, however, because radiocarbon C dating is one of the most reliable of all the radiometric dating methods.

This article will answer several of the most common creationist attacks on carbon dating, using the question-answer format that has proved so useful to lecturers and debaters.

Recent Rapid Formation of Coal and Oil £ Circular Reasoning in Dating Methods £ Age of the Earth £ Evidence of Rapid Fossilization £

Scientists use certain elements present in a certain abundance to calculate an approximate age for rocks. One of the decay ratios used is Uranium decaying through a series of alpha and beta decays to Lead. The number in superscript preceding the element name indicates the atomic mass, the sum of its protons and neutrons. Alpha decay releases a Helium nucleus two protons and two neutrons from the parent atom to create two atoms: the released Helium and a daughter product that has an atomic number two less than the original and an atomic mass four less than the original.

Using the amount of the remaining Uranium, the amount of Lead that has built up, and the original amount of Lead which is not created by any known decay process, scientists can calculate an approximate age based on the decay rate of Uranium and the ratios of Uranium to Lead and Lead to Lead. Some creationists claim that there is too much helium in Earth’s crust for the earth to be any more than two million years old Sarfati, If Earth has existed for billions of years, there should be little helium left in deeper rocks as a result of radioactive alpha decay.

They claim that if God had created the Earth with initial Helium in the atmosphere, the maximum age would be even lower than two million-perhaps even as little as 6, years Humphreys et. The RATE Radioisotopes and the Age of The Earth project, cosponsored by the Institute for Creation Research, the Creation Research Society, and Answers in Genesis, claims that the amount of helium present in minerals at different depths of the earth’s crust is too high to support day-age or evolutionist theories about an old Earth.

They sent rock samples to a lab for helium diffusion tests, and their results were that the rock samples have too little resistance to the diffusion of Helium through the rock for the age to be greater than at most two million years. The conclusion reached by the RATE project as to the reason for the increased amount of Helium is that sometime in the past few thousand years there was a period of increased radioactivity DeYoung, , A fundamental problem with this hypothesis, however, is that the amount of energy released during the accelerated decay proposed by RATE would potentially be enough to evaporate the oceans and melt the Earth’s crust Ross, ,

Answers in Genesis — Creation Geology

First Published 30 Jan Can we rely on radiometric dating techniques? How accurate are they? First, I’ll start by referring you to an extensive article on the young earth creation science website Answers in Genesis , titled “What About Carbon Dating? No, they are not.

Secular scientists have several dating methods at their disposal, which they claim support their views. Does that mean the Bible is wrong? Does it.

The Institute for Creation Research ICR is a Creationist apologetics institute in Dallas , Texas that specializes in media promotion of pseudoscientific creation science and interpretation of the Genesis creation narrative as a historical event. Its work in the field of creation science has been rejected by mainstream science , but has been significant in shaping creationist thought in the United States by introducing creation science through fundamentalist churches and religious schools, and by engaging in public debates against supporters of evolution.

However, the Segraveses and Morris disagreed on the focus of the center, with the Segraveses favoring political and promotional activities, whilst Morris favored educational and scientific efforts. This led to the breakup of the center in , with the Segraveses taking control of the center and severing ties with the university, with Morris reorganising the remaining staff into the Institute for Creation Research. The ICR defined its work in terms of three ministries: research, writing and speaking.

Historian of science Ronald L. Numbers states that “[d]espite its name, the institute for years conducted little research outside the confines of its modest library” and cites founding member Duane Gish as “explain[ing] apologetically in , [that] the staff devoted much of its research effort to scouring the scientific literature for references favorable to creationism. Austin, working as an “off and on” visiting scientist until taking a full staff position in , single-handedly conducting most of its non-literary research.

Lammerts complained that “[t]he main trouble is that Henry looks at this whole thing as a sort of ‘missionary’ effort rather than a scientific one.

Andrew Snelling: A Geologist Discusses Dating Methods